View Single Post
Old 23rd April 2009, 11:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
RocketRev
UKFR Moderator
 
RocketRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 8,783
Default

Yes........ 3648x2736 & 4MB was direct from my camera. (And that was from the bog standard compact camera - not a higher standard SLR etc.)


A couple of thoughts against going down that route....... I think that'd be overkill for web viewing. And maybe more importantly - it'd also make it possible for anyone to nick for whatever use elsewhere the original full resolution photo. I much rather prefer to show smaller, lower resolution, more compressed photos online.
RocketRev is online now   Reply With Quote