Fireworks Forum

Go Back  UKFR >  Fireworks Forum > Main Forums > General Firework Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 5th December 2009, 12:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
hotdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: watford
Posts: 877
Default Firework blast kills 100

'More than 100 dead' in Russian nightclub explosion | World news | guardian.co.uk

BBC News - Explosion in Russian nightclub 'kills scores'
hotdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2009, 4:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
ozbiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Geelong Australia
Posts: 156
Default

According to reports "outdoor" fireworks were used.... inside.
ozbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2009, 9:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
UKFR Moderator
 
Andy_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
BPA: Level 2 - AP10126323
Posts: 7,970
Default

How can they describe this as a "blast" or "explosion"?

From the video and reports I've heard, it was just "a spark" setting a rush matting ceiling covering alight, causing a fire.

As the Russian official said: "There were fireworks launched at the scene, and one hit the plastic ceiling, setting all ablaze. People panicked and succumbed to burns, general crush and gas poisoning."
Andy_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2009, 10:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
UKFR Moderator
 
RocketRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 8,792
Default

The press reports linked to above were the "breaking news" reports. So they'd have been based on early eye witness accounts and the like. Such are well known to produce all sorts of widely differing accounts about what happened. It's understandable given the chaos, confusion and stress of the moment. Those who were inside the building would quite likely still be in shock and be trying to cope with surviving a traumatic event. Those outside the building would also be shaken and trying to guess what could have caused what they were seeing. People may have heard the bang of a firework - then the next thing they saw was the flames. It's easy then to think that an explosion had happened.

The video that I've seen appears to show folk taking part in activities - not watching fireworks. If the early eye witness accounts came from folk who weren't really paying attention to the fireworks (because they were doing something else - another activity, ordering at the bar, in the toilets or some other part of the club....) then it would be understandable for them to talk of a bang followed by fire as an explosion.

It's only now, as more detailed examinations have taken place and the assessment of accounts and videos has been done, that it's clearer that "explosion" isn't an appropriate description.
RocketRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2009, 8:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
UKFR Moderator
 
Andy_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
BPA: Level 2 - AP10126323
Posts: 7,970
Default

All the eye-witness descriptions seemed to refer to it as a fire and smoke so no confusion there. It's only the UK headlines that used the emotive language.
Andy_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 AM. vBulletin® 3.8.4 ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2

©1999-2012 UK Firework Review. All rights reserved.