Fireworks Forum

Go Back  UKFR >  Fireworks Forum > Professional Fireworks and Trade > Professional Fireworks


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 2nd November 2009, 10:08 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
njmchase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Beckenham
BPA: NC18911032/IC/ADR
Posts: 881
Default

That's no Justin.... I guess he was the one on the moving coaster!
njmchase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2009, 11:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
blackbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mid Herts
BPA: JP7415888
Posts: 2,546
Default

It's not me, and no one was on the moving coaster before a discussion ensues about the merits of sitting on a coaster in full flight with a dozen theatrical gerbs going off .
blackbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 10:22 AM   #13 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East London
Posts: 626
Default

Seems like a perfectly responsible method of securing large tubes. Secure, single tube to a stake and ties, well separated. No racks to break, no racks to carry which would be heavy! Any single failure would not be catastrophic.

Just a bit difficult on concrete!

I
Arthur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 10:54 AM   #14 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
Gerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dorchester, Dorset - ish
BPA: Level 2 GL6694
Posts: 2,110
Default

Quote:
Any single failure would not be catastrophic.
It could well be - if any one of those tubes fell after firing and dislodged any neighbouring tubes as yet unfired . . .

May not be seen in the dark - in the smoke, etc etc.

I use stronger cable ties on any single tube - a minimum of 3, and when warranted a seperate one tied looser than the rest and all taped over.

If the tight ones break on firing then the loose one should in theory stay in position and be enough to stop the empty tube falling over.

I wouldnt use single wooden stakes though . . .

Spacing and setup looks fine, but I would use metal stakes plus some form of built in reduncency - ie my extra cable tie/s looser in case the others let go on shock of firing.
Gerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 12:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
RocketScientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
BPA: Level 2
Posts: 196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry View Post
Quote:
Any single failure would not be catastrophic.
It could well be - if any one of those tubes fell after firing and dislodged any neighbouring tubes as yet unfired . . .
Not a problem. This method of fixing (if done properly) is quite strong enough to resist a falling neighbouring tube.
RocketScientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 2:07 PM   #16 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
Gerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dorchester, Dorset - ish
BPA: Level 2 GL6694
Posts: 2,110
Default

Maybe so - but still not a fan of using wood to stake anything giving a hefty shock. How many times has anyone hit a wooden stake and it has fractured, or found any split ones after a display.

Just my opinion - not knocking the methods used
Gerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 3:37 PM   #17 (permalink)
UKFR Moderator
 
Andy_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
BPA: Level 2 - AP10126323
Posts: 7,970
Default

They use bamboo for scaffolding in the far east... withstands earthquakes better then steel ones apparently.
Andy_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 5:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
Jay
Registered Member
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester
BPA: level 2
Posts: 138
Default

Can't really comment with my experience level, but looking at the picture does make me a little nervous. A single stake doesn't seem to leave much room for error, or preventing the morter from falling off in the direction of the audience.

For the sake of a bit of extra time, it would seem worthwhile to back them up with a second stake or possibly third in a tripod method.

Still it is difficult to judge from a photo, and I guess the success of the shows is testament to the reliablity of the method.
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 6:59 PM   #19 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
Gerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dorchester, Dorset - ish
BPA: Level 2 GL6694
Posts: 2,110
Default

Thats true Andy - seen it a few times - but Bamboo does not have the same properties of our 'normal' wood and has great resistance to bending and loads put on it.

Plus it aint wood

As I said - tis all my opinions and not knocking anything here on a photo
Gerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2009, 11:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
BPA: Level 2 BPA
Posts: 109
Default

4-40HD HVY GR STAKES 6PK 4FT 40 - CheapPetProducts.Net

Solves all your problems tbh Try them on a 8" shell - then again maybe not
ProPyro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 AM. vBulletin® 3.8.4 ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2

©1999-2012 UK Firework Review. All rights reserved.