Hmmmm...
I fire for a professional firework display company, so I'm regarded as being a professional here in the way we usually understand the term. But I'm an employee of the company - not with my own insurance or cat4 store or personal access to cat4.
But yet....
Try this for size.....
My Church has insurance cover for firework displays. Any displays it has have to be under my control because, as Vicar, I am the named insured. I do the annual 5th November displays and a few at other times of the year, too (opening of our new children's Early Years / Day Care facility, the Children In Need charity display for example). I started these displays - there were none in my parish before me. I organise them, manage all aspects of them, fire them etc. It's now recognised - and endorsed by the Bishop - that I do these displays as part of my work. It's something that the Church in my place does in and for the community. It's something that this particular Vicar does as part of his job. I don't do them in my spare time as a hobby activity.
So I reckon I could make a good case to be covered by this....
Quote:
|
any person who is employed by, or in business as, a professional organiser or operator of firework displays and who possesses the firework in question for the purposes of his employment or business;
|
At the moment I restrict what I do to cat2 & 3. But maybe I could extend it to cat4. My insurance doesn't specify or restrict what's used, although to be fair I'd want to negotiate a cat4 clause if I intended to use that. At the moment the insurance provides year round cover, but maybe a per event arrangement would be required if I asked about doing cat4. So that would put me into the "single event" scenario with a preference for obtaining cat4 on the day rather than running a permanent store.
I'm not thinking of going down that route.... and my insurer might get cold feet if I asked, for fear of creating a precedent that lets other, pyrotechnically inexperienced, Vicars in. I was just thinking about how the subject being discussed might work out and might actually be appropriate / OK.